PRESS RELEASE
State of Emergency: A Democratic Coup Against the People of Rivers State instigated by the unchecked desperation of President Tinubu’s Minister -Opposition Coalition leaders
… Supreme Court have held that democratic structures can not be dissolved under emergency rule as it amounts to overthrow of another arm of govt.
… Usurping National Assembly powers to take over powers of State Assemblies in moments of crisis and giving it to Federal Executive Council is huge assault on our constitutional democracy.
…Illegally suspending an elected Gov.Fubara from office and leaving Tinubu’s Minister Wike who instigated the crisis have shown the President have taken side.
Nigeria’s Opposition coalition(CUPP) Coalition of United Political Parties after an emergency meeting has said that nothing warranted the declaration of State of emergency on Rivers State, suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his Deputy by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu vowing to seek legal action to quash this latest assault on Nigeria Constitutional democracy that have great implications for the survival of democratic governance in Nigeria .
We strongly condemn the recent suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and the Rivers State House of Assembly by President Bola Tinubu. This action is a blatant violation of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) and an alarming abuse of power.
Tinubu had on Tuesday declared a state of emergency in Rivers State following the protracted political crisis in the state. He made the proclamation during a nationwide broadcast, suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy and all the members of the House of Assembly for six months.
Reacting to the development, the coalition in a statement jointly signed by CUPP leaders High Chief Peter Ameh, Ikenga Imo ugochinyere and Comrade Mark Adebayo described the suspension as unacceptable and a democratic coup against the Rivers people in favour of dark ambition of greedy desperados.
The coalition recalled that when President Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe States in May 2013 he rejected the illegal advice of some power mongers to remove the elected governors and dissolve other democratic structures in the affected states.
Citing some constitutional provisions, the coalition stated that State governments do not answer to the Federal government as they are separate and the President has authority over federal employees and no other.
The coalition warned that allowing this unlawful suspension sets a precedent for a dictatorship masked as democracy, adding that usurping national assembly powers to take over powers of state assembly and giving it to federal executive Council is a coup against democracy.
The statement reads, “The suspension of a sitting Governor under the guise of a state of emergency is an illegal and unconstitutional act, amounting to a coup against democracy. This move serves the dark ambitions of desperate political actors and undermines the sovereignty of the Nigerian people.
“Since the Supreme Court ruling, Governor Fubara has tried to act right but these guys the local political blackmailers and propagandist, keep suffering Rivers state. The governor compiled and presented the budget and they ran away from receiving him meaning their interest is not the budget but to ensure the people of Rivers their own people suffer and die from hunger.
“The Governor wrote another letter to them and they claimed to have gone on recess on Friday evening and now suddenly the people who went on recess on Friday wakes up on Monday to claim they have commenced a purported impeachment, just to distract the slated budget presentation billed for this week. With this declaration the Federal Government and its political allies have systematically undermined the peace in Rivers State. The recent pipeline explosion—likely a deliberate act by Abuja-backed elements—is a calculated attempt to justify emergency rule.
“This suspension is in Violation of Section 1(2) of the 1999 Constitution (As Amended) The Constitution expressly prohibits any forceful takeover of government outside democratic and constitutional processes: The Federal Republic of Nigeria shall not be governed, nor shall any person or group of persons take control of the government of Nigeria or any part thereof, except in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.” Suspending a sitting governor violates this provision, as no state of emergency grants the President the power to remove or suspend a duly elected official.
“The Supreme Court of Nigeria has consistently ruled that the declaration of a state of emergency does not empower the President to remove elected officials. In A.G. Federation v. A.G. Lagos State (2013) LPELR-20974(SC), the Supreme Court ruled that: “Under no circumstances shall the democratic structures be suspended or dissolved, even in a state of emergency.” In the case of A.G. Plateau State v. A.G. Federation (2006), the Supreme Court invalidated the removal of elected officials during a state of emergency in Plateau State.
“In 2013, former President Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency in Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa states, yet: He did not remove or suspend the governors. He stated that “all democratic structures remain intact” while security operations intensified.”
The Constitution is unequivocal in its provisions regarding the removal of a duly elected governor. Section 188 clearly outlines the impeachment process, which is the sole legal mechanism for removing a governor, and it is exclusively the prerogative of the State House of Assembly. Nowhere in the Constitution is the President granted the authority to suspend a governor or their deputy.
Furthermore, Section 1(2) of the Constitution explicitly states: “The Federal Republic of Nigeria shall not be governed, nor shall any person or group of persons take control of the Government of Nigeria or any part thereof, except in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.” President Tinubu’s actions are therefore unconstitutional and undermine the rule of law and will be vigorously challenged by the coalition.
Section 11(4) and (5) of the Constitution allows the National Assembly to intervene in the affairs of a State House of Assembly only in cases where the Assembly is unable to perform its functions due to crisis. Even in such circumstances, this provision does not extend to suspending an elected governor or deputy. Additionally, Section 308 grants immunity to governors and their deputies from civil or criminal proceedings while in office, raising serious questions about the legal basis for the President’s actions.
The Coalition praised Gov. Fubara for maintaining peace despite the provocation by those working for Tinubu urging him to remain strong and rally Rivers People to ensure that his constitutional powers are not taken away under any guise including challenging this illegality at the Supreme Court.
From Opposition Coalition HQRS (CUPP)
March 18, 2025
PRESS RELEASE
SENATOR TAMBUWAL: SOKOTO STATE PEOPLE REMAIN RESOLUTE FOR CHANGE
As the mass of Nigerian citizens live in growing fear of the future of the nation’s Democracy under the present APC Administration, the People’s Democratic Party in Sokoto State wishes to express alarm at escalating deployment of state institutions as tools of repression against political opposition by the Government of Ahmed Bola Tinubu, through its agents across the country.
The arrest of the immediate past Governor of Sokoto State, Senator Aminu Waziri Tambuwal by the EFCC last Monday is viewed by all perceptive Nigerians as the continuation of the assault on political dissent in the country, especially against the background of the gathering coalition of progressive forces against the ongoing misrule by the incumbent administration. The selective and discriminatory manner the anti-graft agency conducts its activities, clearly proves the desperation of the APC-led government to cling to power against growing national rejection.
The motive of the trumped up probe is obvious to the people of Sokoto State, who testify to the fiscal discipline and financial prudence of the Tambuwal eight years administration as Governor, especially those who served in his government. We note that the so-called investigation is a mere fishing trip at the instance of political actors within the state and Abuja, who have in the past several years, been obsessed with smearing his enviable image and intimidating him into abandoning his opposition to their misrule.
It is common knowledge in many quarters in Sokoto State that the current issue being touted by the anti-corruption body is an old phantom that has repeatedly hit the brick wall. The matter is therefore, being raised from the dead by desperate political forces, who themselves have genuine corruption case files gathering dust at the EFCC that are ignored for obvious partisan reasons.
Our Party wishes to re-echo the demand of the citizens of Nigeria for anti-graft agencies in the country to live above board and desist from being tools for the execution of political agendas. Their constitutional obligations to the nation should take precedence over the whims of repressive elements in the corridors of power.
The PDP shares the confidence of the people of Sokoto State in the unblemished credibility of Aminu Waziri Tambuwal and our trust in his ethical and moral uprightness cannot be shaken by trumped-up probes, while we remain resolute in following his lead in the pursuit of change in our state and nation at large.
We urge supporters of our Great Party and the good people of Sokoto to remain law-abiding and steadfast in the demand for and work for change towards genuine democracy and good governance in our state and Nigeria as a whole and never be daunted by the repressive schemes of reactionary forces, no matter how highly placed.
Signed,
Hassan Sahabi Sanyinnawal,
Publicity Secretary, PDP Sokoto State
PRESS RELEASE
IGP welcomes protests by retired policemen
The Nigeria Police Force has noted the ongoing conversations surrounding the peaceful protest being organised by some of our retired officers in relation to their pension entitlements. While some of these accounts are grounded in fact and driven by good faith, others have been marred by misinformation, emotional manipulation, and calculated distortions designed to discredit the Government and undermine the present leadership of the Nigeria Police Force.
It is disheartening to observe how certain actors have chosen to politicise a sensitive welfare issue, weaponizing the legitimate grievances of our retired colleagues for ulterior motives. Their intent is not reform, but disruption. Their tactics involve twisting facts, inflaming sentiments, and sowing distrust in the public space. These actions do a disservice not only to our noble institution, but to the integrity of public discourse in our country. We however remain focused on the real issue which is the welfare of those who once bore the burden of national security with courage and honour.
The agitation for improved police pensions, particularly the call for exit from the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS), is not a recent development. It has spanned over a decade. Since 2014, successive Inspectors-General of Police have demonstrated empathy, engaged critical stakeholders, and provided institutional support for this cause. Yet, despite these earnest efforts, the desired outcome has remained elusive; not for lack of will, but due to entrenched legal provisions, fiscal limitations, and administrative bottlenecks. The hard truth is that exiting the Police from the CPS lies beyond the remit of any Inspector-General, as the matter is deeply woven into a web of statutory mandates, inter-agency protocols, and policy inertia.
Moreover, expert projections indicate that as the scheme matures, its benefits are expected to significantly improve. Officers retiring within the next five years are projected to receive significantly more favourable pension outcomes than those currently exiting the system. In practical terms, this means that the longer one remains in the scheme, the less likely they are to experience the same pension challenges. This evolving reality demands a pragmatic review of our approach.
In recognition of these constraints and shifting dynamics, the current Police leadership is pursuing a dual-track strategy of supporting the agitation in principle, while urgently exploring innovative, alternative solutions to address the immediate plight of our retirees. These include utilising internally generated revenues from police services to provide supplementary pension benefits; and mobilising private sector and corporate support for the establishment of targeted pension enhancement initiatives.
These interventions are already underway and reflect a broader, more holistic strategy to elevate the welfare of our retired personnel, not merely through policy debates, but through tangible results. The Federal government has been sensitized enough and appropriate responses are being awaited.
Let it be stated unequivocally that this explanation is not intended to suppress the planned protest. On the contrary, it reflects a leadership that listens, understands, and engages in good faith. The Inspector-General of Police has interacted extensively with many retired officers over the past year, and several groups have since withdrawn their support for the protest, having appreciated the direction of current efforts. However, for those who still choose to proceed, their rights will be protected. The protest is scheduled to take place on Monday, 21st July 2025, primarily within the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and any other State Command where prior notification has been duly given.
Accordingly, the Inspector-General of Police has directed all Commissioners of Police to ensure the peaceful conduct of the protest within their jurisdictions, especially in the FCT and other states where formal notice has been received; provide adequate security coverage to our retired colleagues who have chosen to publicly express their grievances; prevent any hijack of the protest by miscreants, political actors, or non-retired agitators; sensitise officers and men under their command on the constitutional rights to peaceful assembly, and the obligation to show utmost respect to our retired colleagues; while deploying intelligence and operational resources to protect lives, maintain public order, and safeguard institutional integrity.
The Inspector-General of Police charges all officers to note that this protest, described as “the mother of all peaceful protests”, must not only be peaceful; it must be exemplary, and as such should stand as a national model for dignified expression of grievance and responsible public order management. We must show, by conduct and command, that the Nigeria Police Force is both professional and humane. He further reiterates that this is more than a directive; it is a call to institutional responsibility, a test of our maturity, our values, and our discipline.
Let us rise to this moment with wisdom, restraint, and unwavering respect for those who served before us. Serving officers are however warned not to be misled by those who either are ignorant of the ethics of our profession or are up for manipulations and disruption.
ACP OLUMUYIWA ADEJOBI, mnipr, mipra, fCAI,
FORCE PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICER,
FOR: INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE
20th July, 2025
PRESS RELEASE
FENRAD Condemns Extra-Judicial Killing in Umuahia: Demands Investigation and Prosecution of Perpetrators
The Foundation for Environmental Rights, Advocacy & Development (FENRAD), a pro-democracy and human rights advocacy group, strongly condemns the gruesome and unwarranted shooting of a young man by operatives of Operation Crush in Umuahia, Abia State.
According to verified accounts and eyewitness reports, the young man, whose identity is now known to the public, was shot at close range by security personnel attached to Operation Crush, a joint task force reportedly established to combat crime. This tragic incident occurred in broad daylight and in the presence of civilians, leaving the community of Umuahia shocked and traumatized.
According to multiple eyewitnesses, the incident occurred at Imo lane off Owerri Road, Umuahia, after the deceased reportedly had a disagreement with another young man in the neighborhood. The other party in the dispute allegedly contacted security operatives who arrived at the scene shortly afterwards.
On sighting the operatives, the deceased was said to have taken off, prompting a chase by the security team. Witnesses allege that during the pursuit, the operatives fired a shot at very close range, hitting the fleeing young man in the stomach.
The bullet was said to have hit his stomach and exited through his body, shattering the windscreen of a parked SUV nearby
FENRAD decries this blatant abuse of power and views it as one in a series of unlawful killings and rights violations committed by some disgruntled elements within security outfits operating in Abia and across Nigeria. No security architecture, no matter the noble intentions behind its formation, should operate above the law or outside the confines of constitutional order.
This latest act of impunity not only violates the right to life as enshrined in Section 33 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), but also contravenes all international human rights standards to which Nigeria is a signatory, including the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the United Nations Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials.
FENRAD is therefore calling for the following:
An immediate investigation into the incident by an independent panel, possibly involving the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Civil Society Organisations, and community leaders.
Identification and arrest of the officers responsible for the shooting.
Full prosecution of those found culpable in line with the law to serve as a deterrent to future abuses.
Compensation and support to the family of the deceased for the unjust loss and trauma suffered.
Review and reform of Operation Crush and similar security units to ensure adherence to rules of engagement and human rights standards.
FENRAD maintains that a society where security agencies operate without accountability is one on the path to tyranny. We urge the Abia State Government, the Nigeria Police Force, and all relevant security institutions to act swiftly, transparently, and responsibly in this matter.
Justice must not only be done — it must be seen to be done.
Signed:
Comrade Nelson Nnanna Nwafor
Executive Director
Foundation for Environmental Rights, Advocacy & Development (FENRAD)
www.fenrad.org.ng
For enquiries and media contact:
📧 info@fenrad.org.ng
📞 +234-8033383708
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
TEL/WHATSAPP; 08033383708,07062949232 Email;fenradnigeria@yahoo.com,info.fenradnigeria@gmail.com, info@fenrad.org.ng. http://www.fenrad.org..ng
-
News10 months agoNUJ FCT Council Mourns The Loss of Senior Journalist, Isaiah Abraham
-
News10 months agoHURIWA Declares Governor Fubara’s Emergence as Divine, Urges Support for Rivers State’s Progress
-
News10 months agoAnioma State as panacea to South-East marginalization – By Emmanuel Onwubiko
-
Opinion8 months agoNIGERIAN WOMAN IN DIASPORA, CULTURAL SHOCKS – By Stacey Ukaobasi Onwuegbuchulam
-
News11 months agoHURIWA Blames Serial Stampedes on Weaponized Poverty, Warns of Nigeria’s Rapid Decline
-
News10 months agoJealous Husband Stabs Nigerian Bishop To Death Over Suspicion Of Sleeping With Estranged Wife
-
News10 months agoTinubu sympathizes with ex-speaker Bankole on the death of his mother
-
Health8 months agoA complete list of 154 healthcare facilities across Nigeria that provide free emergency obstetric care and VVF (Vesico-Vaginal Fistula) surgeries.
