News
Trump’s New World Order is Here! – By Emmanuel Onwubiko
The key points of the inauguration speech made by the 47th President of the United States, Donald John Trump, were encapsulated in the following few chapters of his lengthy speech.
His words: “As we gather today, our government confronts a crisis of trust. For many years, a radical and corrupt establishment has extracted power and wealth from our citizens, while the pillars of our society lay broken and seemingly in complete disrepair.
The American dream will soon be back and thriving like never before. To restore competence and effectiveness to our federal government, my administration will establish the brand-new Department of Government Efficiency.
America will reclaim its rightful place as the greatest, most powerful, most respected nation on Earth, inspiring the awe and admiration of the entire world. A short time from now, we are going to be changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.
The United States will once again consider itself a growing nation, one that increases our wealth, expands our territory, builds our cities, raises our expectations, and carries our flag into new and beautiful horizons. And we will pursue our manifest destiny into the stars, launching American astronauts to plant the stars and stripes on the planet Mars.
We are one people, one family, and one glorious nation under God. So to every parent who dreams for their child, and every child who dreams for their future, I am with you, I will fight for you, and I will win for you. We are going to win like never before. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
In recent years, our nation has suffered greatly. But we are going to bring it back and make it great again, greater than ever before. We will be a nation like no other, full of compassion, courage, and exceptionalism. Our power will stop all wars and bring a new spirit of unity to a world that has been angry, violent, and totally unpredictable.
America will be respected again and admired again, including by people of religion, faith, and good will. We will be prosperous, we will be proud, we will be strong, and we will win like never before. We will not be conquered, we will not be intimidated, we will not be broken, and we will not fail. From this day on, the United States of America will be a free, sovereign, and independent nation.
We will stand bravely, we will live proudly, we will dream boldly, and nothing will stand in our way because we are Americans. The future’s ours. And our golden age has just begun. Thank you, God bless America, thank you all.”
President Trump anchored his speech and unveiled his blueprint on the mantra of MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN (MAGA), even as he promised to ensure that in every action he would take during his second stint as the world’s most powerful political leader, his country’s national interest comes first, which he termed “AMERICA FIRST.” Throughout his inaugural address, which was witnessed live by some of the wealthiest living human beings in our time—such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and other heavyweights whose combined net worth is higher than the wealth accumulated by every member of the human race—the assembly that saw President Trump as the leader of the USA was made up of the richest living persons to have ever existed on the planet.
The presence, solidarity, and endorsement of the second coming of President Donald John Trump for his second term, beginning on January 20th, 2025, demonstrates the main thrust of the administration, which is to once again make America the richest and most productive nation on Earth. Trump also signaled his determination to flush out undocumented immigrants numbering in the millions, just as border security was emphasized as the central theme of his mandate as the President of the USA for the next four years. He said he had already detailed military troops to safeguard some borders through which illegal aliens flood into the USA, and one novel approach to law enforcement was Donald Trump’s declaration of hard drug cartels and barons as TERRORISTS, having accordingly signed an executive order to that effect. Trump signed over 100 executive orders to begin the implementation of some of his salient programs which he believes would make America great again.
There are fears that Trump’s closeness to the dictator of Russia, Vladimir Putin, could endanger the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which connects Europe and the USA in a binding security and defense treaty. Trump is not known to be a supporter of the massive scale of funds that the Joe Biden administration gave out to Ukraine during its ongoing war with Russia, which invaded and annexed several Ukrainian territories. Just as Trump has stressed the strategic importance of imposing tariffs to discourage US markets from being flooded by foreign-made goods, especially from competitors like China, Trump’s administration is expected to be at odds with many foreign policies pursued by the previous administration. Trump wants TikTok to belong to American billionaires, with the Chinese founder retaining 50%. Already, the US Supreme Court validated a congressional law banning TikTok in the USA for security reasons, but Trump signed an executive order to suspend the execution of the law for a few days so that there could be a negotiated settlement giving 50 percent ownership to American billionaires.
Ideologically, the presidency of Donald John Trump is seen as the right answer to the departure of much of the American establishment from the belief in God. In the last few years, the Democrats pursued policies that antagonized belief in God, and the epithet IN GOD WE TRUST, the motto of the USA, was almost abrogated by Joe Biden, a self-acclaimed Roman Catholic, who against all logical thinking, declared Easter Sunday as GAY DAY, just to offend conservative Christians. Trump’s return would serve as an effective check and balance to the near domination of the world order by defenders of the rights of those with lifestyles that manifest same-gender sexual orientations. It is in this light that Nigeria and much of Africa would experience a reprieve from the external political and economic pressures mounted by the Democrats, led by Joe Biden, a rabid supporter of gay rights.
A policy paper published by a US government foreign services agency, dated June 17, 2013, at 10:36 AM, stated the following: “The passage of the Same-Sex Marriage Prohibition Bill on May 31, 2013, by the Nigerian House of Representatives places President Goodluck Jonathan in a tricky position. Not signing the bill risks alienating his own government and signaling to the general public that he does not support one of the few issues that brings the majority of Nigerians together. Alternatively, signing such legislation may cost the country substantial sums of international aid and investment. Either way, gay marriage—an otherwise unlikely political issue—may significantly influence the Nigerian political debate leading up to the 2015 national elections.”
The bill, which received unanimous approval in the House, inched closer to becoming law in the oil-rich nation. In simple terms, the bill prohibits same-sex marriage contracts from being issued or recognized by the state. However, if President Jonathan signs the current version, the law would also enable courts to levy criminal charges against public displays of affection between individuals of the same sex. It would further make it a criminal offense to establish or operate gay organizations in Nigeria—incurring penalties of mandatory imprisonment if found guilty.
Recent studies have found Nigerians to be overwhelmingly against accepting homosexuality, even in comparison to other African nations with anti-gay legislation. However, according to Nigerian civil society groups, the recent version passed by the House places more than just the LGBT community at risk. Both Nigerians and international aid workers implementing HIV/AIDS prevention programs may be prosecuted under the new law if their efforts are construed as promoting same-sex relationships.
If President Jonathan signs the bill, questions loom as to what extent the law will be enforced and if the international community will retreat. In 2011, when the Nigerian Senate passed a similar bill, the United Kingdom threatened to withdraw aid; but the Nigerian Senate did not back down.
Even more may be at stake for Nigeria this time. Since the 2011 passage of the Senate version of the bill, the Obama administration publicly affirmed its stance toward the advancement of LGBT rights across the globe, even suggesting that the United States might tie aid to support for LGBT rights. However, it remains an open question whether the United States will divest aid from countries with anti-LGBT legislation, particularly in light of President Obama’s previous statement that “Africa’s future is up to Africans.”
Under the Obama administration, and later under Joe Biden’s presidency, the U.S. claimed that Nigeria’s anti-gay laws have the potential to violate not only international treaties and conventions—many of which Nigeria has signed—but also the country’s Constitution. There is a justifiable concern that this law could be used to abridge Nigerians’ rights to freedom of speech, association, and assembly. Yet, the bill’s enactment may also lead to political blackmailing and rampant abuse by the country’s security forces.
During Obama and Biden’s administrations, many Nigerian anti-gay activists feared that then-President Obama might pressure President Buhari during his U.S. visit. Nigerian opponents of gay rights vowed to defend the country’s anti-gay laws as President Muhammadu Buhari met his United States counterpart, Barack Obama, in Washington D.C., on Monday. Some feared that Washington would threaten to reduce aid if these laws remained on the statute books.
On July 20, 2015, a U.S. media publication affirmed that former Nigerian president Goodluck Jonathan steered an anti-gay law through parliament in 2014, which also banned same-sex marriage. The law criminalized public displays of affection between same-sex couples and penalized organizations advocating for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people.
Mausi Segun, a Human Rights Watch researcher in Nigeria, said, “This law serves no purpose at all. It restricts the right of freedom of assembly and freedom of association.” The United States Supreme Court had recently ruled that gay marriage was a constitutional right, and the U.S. government was trying to push the Nigerian government to review the law.
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, had stated that supporting gay marriage would now be part of Washington’s foreign policy. The United States had recently pressured Uganda to reverse its anti-gay law and had influenced Mozambique to scrap its own anti-gay laws.
The American administration knows that Nigeria is a very religious country, with recent polls indicating that 85 percent of Nigerians oppose gay marriage. The Nigerian government, however, is very unlikely to give in to this pressure, as stated by Bishop Felix Akinbuluma: “The Nigerian government will never succumb to that. The people will never succumb to that. The Bible is our standard, and it says that men and women should be married together. This is the will of God. In Nigeria, several religions oppose it as well.”
Anti-LGBT activists argue that the U.S. is now the major exporter of gay rights in the world. They fear that Obama could leverage U.S. assistance to pressure Buhari’s government into reversing Jonathan’s anti-gay law, and they have called on Buhari to resist such a trade-off.
Buhari, elected that year, had to contend with several major issues during his four-day trip to the U.S. Pro-LGBT activists were fully aware of these complexities. Michael Ighodaro from the Global Advocacy for HIV Prevention group noted that, “The situation is still the same; people are being attacked, and there have been a few arrests.” Public awareness and the rights of LGBT people need to be a primary focus, he said.
What Does a Donald Trump Presidency Mean for LGBTQ+ Rights?
Lucy Middleton posed the question in a piece published on November 6, 2024, asking, “What does a Donald Trump presidency mean for LGBTQ+ rights?”
Trump, whose campaign was criticized for being anti-LGBTQ+, made a comeback and won the 2024 U.S. presidential election. His victory followed a campaign that heavily featured anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric. Trump and his running mate, J.D. Vance, secured more than the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the presidency. Both have been accused of seeking to roll back key LGBTQ+ rights, and millions of dollars were spent on ads using anti-transgender messaging during the campaign.
LGBTQ+ advocates and allies have described a possible Trump administration as dangerous for the community, citing policies against gender-affirming care for minors, education in schools, and protection from discrimination. Here’s a summary of Trump’s stance on LGBTQ+ rights:
What Has Trump Pledged to Do on LGBTQ+ Rights? Trump has outlined a number of policies that will change the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans, particularly transgender individuals. His plan includes:
- A ban on gender-affirming healthcare for trans minors.
- Restricting government programs that “promote” changing gender at any age.
- Blocking the participation of trans female athletes in women’s sports.
- Removing any clinician who provides trans healthcare to minors from Medicare and Medicaid.
- Imposing severe consequences for teachers who suggest to children that they might be a different gender than their biological sex.
- Federal recognition of only the gender assigned at birth, either male or female.
- Giving parents control over what their children are taught in schools, including cutting federal funding for any school that promotes “gender ideology.”
Trump also promised to eliminate “left-wing gender programs” from the military and remove Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) bureaucrats from universities.
What Is Trump’s Record on LGBTQ+ Rights? In his first presidency, Trump sought to roll back anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people across various sectors, including healthcare, employment, adoption, school restrooms, housing, and homeless shelters. Many of these policies included religion-based exemptions that allowed LGBTQ+ people to be excluded on the grounds of faith.
Additionally, the Trump administration banned trans Americans from serving in the military, a policy Biden reversed, and removed LGBTQ+ content from federal websites. Trump also re-assigned the U.S. Special Envoy for LGBTQ+ Rights, leaving the post vacant until 2021.
What Have LGBTQ+ Groups Said? Multiple LGBTQ+ organizations have strongly criticized Trump’s actions. GLAAD, a nonprofit LGBTQ+ advocacy organization, documented Trump’s anti-LGBTQ+ policies, while the Human Rights Campaign described him as the most anti-LGBTQ+ president in American history.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) published an analysis of Trump’s record, highlighting the harmful impact of his policies on LGBTQ+ individuals. Advocates have said defeating Trump in the election is “critical for the cause of equality.”
In conclusion, there is a general belief that President Donald John Trump represents a New World Order, but for how long and how impactful this new order will be remains to be seen. While it is within the remit of any president to prioritize the interests of their own country, it is crucial that Trump does not forget that the strength of the United States is also rooted in its support for democracy and human rights worldwide.
As he works to make America great again, he must not neglect the global spread of democracy or the human rights of citizens across the world. America’s greatness will remain limited if it allows nations like Uganda, Rwanda, and Nigeria to continue to be led by dictatorial regimes. Ensuring that periodic elections in African nations are transparent, free, fair, and peaceful should become a cornerstone of Trump’s New World Order. That way, Trump can avoid betraying and alienating the conservative Africans who supported him during his campaign. America First, yes—but the well-being of the rest of the world matters too.
Emmanuel Onwubiko is the head of the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) and was a National Commissioner of the National Human Rights Commission of Nigeria.
News
ARISE News Anchor Somtochukwu Maduagwu Found Dead Following Abuja Robbery, Reports FCTA
The Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) has confirmed that Somtochukwu Maduagwu was brought to Maitama Hospital without vital signs after a robbery incident at her home in Abuja.
Dr. Dolapo Fasawe, the Mandate Secretary on Health for the FCTA, stated that ARISE News anchor Somtochukwu Maduagwu was pronounced dead upon arrival at Maitama General Hospital at approximately 4:30 am on Monday. This clarification was issued via a statement from the FCTA, aimed at addressing earlier claims that medical negligence contributed to her demise following the robbery.
Somtochukwu Christelle Maduagwu, affectionately known as Sommie, was a 29-year-old journalist tragically killed during an armed robbery at her Katampe residence in Abuja in the early hours of Monday, September 29, 2025.
Residents of the apartment complex reported that the attack transpired around 3 a.m. when over 15 armed robbers invaded the 16-apartment building. Witnesses indicated that security personnel sounded the alarm and tried to reach the police, but there was no immediate response. Sommie and a security guard, who also sustained injuries during the incident, were promptly taken to Maitama District Hospital. However, family members claimed they were denied urgent treatment due to not having identification documents readily available. Both victims later succumbed to their injuries.
In the meantime, FCT Minister Nyesom Wike expressed his condolences to the management and staff of ARISE News Channel regarding the unfortunate demise of Somtochukwu Maduagwu. He described her death as both tragic and painful, and he prayed for God’s continued support for the staff of ARISE News, particularly for the Chairman, Prince Nduka Obaigbena, and for the family and friends of the late journalist. The minister noted that a preliminary medical report would be provided to the police to assist in their investigation, emphasizing that all necessary steps would be taken to uncover the details surrounding her death. He reassured the family, friends, and colleagues of Somtochukwu Maduagwu that the police are committed to discovering the circumstances of her passing and ensuring that those responsible face justice.
Source: ARISE TV
News
Negotiations With Terrorists Undermine Elements Of Nigeria’s Statehood: HURIWA says
Pro-democracy and civil rights advocacy group HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has condemned the Federal government for permitting some states in the North-west to negotiate the so-called peace agreement with terrorists, criminal gangs and armed kidnappers, just as the Rights group said the negotiations have undermined and eroded the key elements of Nigeria’s statehood.
HURIWA blames the ambiguities of the Federal government on how to deal decisively with armed brutes killing thousands of Nigerians for the expanding frontiers of terrorist attacks and the unprecedented insecurity in many parts of Nigeria. “Since the Federal Government is creating the impression that it is open to dialogue with terrorists, then more and more desperate criminals would escalate their criminal activities, hoping that they too would merit an invitation for dialogue by the current administration that is already discussing with terrorists in the North West for the so-called peace.
Criminal gang members who are watching the dialogue sessions with terrorists in the North West will automatically become daring and bloody so as to gain attention of the government that is too weak to militarily defeat terrorists and very willing to enter into negotiations for the so-called truce.”
HURIWA which expressed the position that any public office holder or private individual who negotiates with terrorists is also a terrorist, has therefore called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to stop the disgraceful surrendering of the Nigerian state to the whims and caprices of a motley crowd of armed bandits, bloodstained terrorists, armed kidnappers and criminal gangs in Katsina and some other states in the Northern States of Nigeria.
HURIWA said there is no doubt that what have played out in the last couple of weeks in Katsina, Zamfara and other places in the North West of Nigeria in the guise of local and state governments negotiating with terrorists for the so-called truce, amounted to the demolition of the four fundamental elements that qualifies Nigeria as a Sovereignty even as HURIWA postulated that the state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population (people); (b) a defined territory; (c) government (political authority); and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states (diplomat recognition or sovereignty).
HURIWA which condemned the negotiations with terrorists, said the impression being created globally with these charades going on in Katsina by way of negotiations for peace with terrorists responsible for killings of dozens of citizens is that Nigeria has gradually lost those key elements of statehood. HURIWA also stated that the negotiations have completely rubbished the determination of the families of victims of terrorism from achieving any sort of closure and justice for the terminations of the lives of their loved ones and the losses of livelihoods they suffered as a result of terrorist attacks.
HURIWA asked rhetorically thus: “Is it not preposterous that whilst the president Tinubu’s government has sanctioned negotiations with terrorists that are wanted by advanced and sophisticated nations such as the United States, the same administration sent out the Vice President Kashim Shettima to the United Nations General Assembly in New York to canvass that Nigeria be made a permanent member of the security council of the United Nations?
“Is this not a pathetic irony to openly demonstrate to the World that Nigeria’s statehood is eroding fast, as demonstrated by the show of shame called peaceful negotiations with terrorists who attended the so-called truce meetings in Katsina state, wielding some of the most sophisticated weapons of mass destruction and other combat weapons of military grades?
Has this government in Nigeria no shame and has the government no respect for the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria? We insist that terrorists must be made to face the full wrath of justice, just as we believe that government is obliged to take justice to terrorists or bring terrorists to justice for their crimes of bloodshed and destruction of livelihoods of Nigerians.
HURIWA recalled that authorities in Nigeria’s northwestern Katsina state reportedly struck a so-called peace deal with criminal gangs in what it says is an effort to end years of violence, a government official confirmed to the media.
HURIWA recalled that Katsina is one of several states in northwestern and central Nigeria terrorized by criminal gangs that the locals refer to as bandits. The federal government, through the Defence Headquarters, had previously declared the leaders of the terrorists groups now negotiating with government as terrorists, even as huge amounts of money was promised as rewards for information leading to their arrests.
HURIWA wondered the logic in negotiating with criminal gangs that continuously raid villages, rape girls and children, kill and abduct residents, as well as torch homes after looting them.
HURIWA recalled that the terrorists and criminal gangs maintain camps in a huge forest straddling Zamfara, Katsina, Kaduna states in the northwest region and Niger state in the country’s central zone and have carried out mass kidnappings of students from schools in recent years.
HURIWA recalled that the Katsina State Government confirmed that a dozen bandit kingpins met with local officials and community leaders in the town of Danmusa, where they renounced violence and pledged to turn a new leaf, Nasiru Mu’azu, Katsina state internal commissioner said.
“There was a peace meeting between 12 bandit leaders and the local community leaders in Danmusa, where the bandits renounced their criminal activities and committed to peace,” Mu’azu said.
The bandits initiated the meeting, he said. “The community welcomed the overtures and agreed to a peace deal as long as the bandits are genuinely interested in peace,” he said.
Katsina state government stated that as a mark of goodwill, the bandits surrendered weapons and released 17 hostages, with the promise to free more people they were holding.
HURIWA said security experts have cautioned against any sort of appeasement of terrorists because, as criminals with zero ideological leaning, the bandits are motivated by financial gains, but their increasing business and operational alliance with jihadists from the northeast has been raising concern among government officials, which is the reason for the illegal negotiations with terrorists.
HURIWA pointed out that in 2023, Katsina state governor Dikko Umar Radda established Katsina Community Watch Corps, comprising around 2,000 vigilantes to assist the military and police in fighting the bandits.
“We have been fighting the bandits for the past two years, and the state governor has reiterated he will not negotiate from a position of weakness,” Mu’azu, the Katsina state official said.
In the media statement by the National Coordinator, Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko, HURIWA reiterated its position of zero tolerance for any sort of negotiations with terrorists because that would amount to state surrender.
“We are asking President Tinubu to stop these acts of treason in the name of negotiations with terrorists. We believe that no matter the quantum of cash paid out to these terrorists now dialoguing with Katsina and other Northern governments, the moment the blood money finishes, these terrorists who are already used to making hundreds of millions of blood money will simply return to their familiar terrains of terrorism and when they do return, they would be even more vicious than they are now.”
COMRADE EMMANUEL NNADOZIE ONWUBIKO,
NATIONAL COORDINATOR,
HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA).
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 29TH 2025.
News
Corruption Becoming Endemic Now: HURIWA Says
TASKS government on transparency in conditional cash transfer
Civil Rights advocacy Group HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has expressed worry about the apparent inability of the Federal government to come clean on how N330 billion was disbursed to 8.1 million households without any compliance with the principles of transparency and accountability. “Most Nigerians are wondering whether this huge sum of public funds were shared to ghosts or to real citizens since these households are not known by millions of Nigerians.”
Besides, HURIWA has raised alarm that corruption is perceived to be so high within the government circles even as the Rights group said it was wrong for President Tinubu to keep silent in the face of mounting accusations of corruption affecting some of his appointees including the allegations of acquisitions of exotic housing assets by the Minister of the Federal capital territory Mr. Nyesom Wike with allegedly looted public funds.
HURIWA recalled that the federal Government had few days ago, announced that it has disbursed a total of N330bn to 8.1 million households across the country under the National Social Safety Net Programme, aimed at cushioning the harsh effects of economic reforms on Nigeria’s poorest and most vulnerable citizens.
The disclosure was made in Abuja by the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, after a review meeting of the Special Presidential Panel on Social Investment, inaugurated by President Bola Tinubu in February.
Edun explained that the programme, which experienced delays earlier in the year, was now firmly back on track following the successful integration of biometric data through the National Identification Number. This integration, he said, was crucial to ensuring transparency, curbing leakages, and eliminating political interference.
According to the minister, out of the 19.7 million households captured in the National Social Register—representing about 70 million Nigerians—8.1 million households have already received at least one tranche of the N25,000 stipend. Some beneficiaries have received two or three payments depending on verification outcomes.
Reacting to the widespread failure of the Federal Government to evidently show believable proof of how this humongous cash were disbursed and to clearly publicise the identities of these beneficiaries, HURIWA said it is shocking that a democratically elected government put in place by the people, could come up with such seemingly phantom claim to have distributed financial lifelines to some impoverished citizens without any concrete evidence.
In a media statement by the National Coordinator Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko, HURIWA criticised the federal ministry of Finance and the Coordinating ministry for the Nigerian economy for issuing out the press statement making the claim that can’t be empirically verified just as the Rights group said over ten thousand members of the organisation spread across the Country has not reported knowing or hearing about any Nigerian poor citizens/households who benefitted from the cash redistribution by the federal government.
“We are challenging the Federal Ministry of Finance and the Coordinating Minister of the Economy to prove to Nigerians that his ministry paid out the sum of N330 bn to 8.1 million households by publishing on the website of the ministry and newspapers the identities of the beneficiaries, their locations and the number in each of the benefiting states or local government areas. This demand is made in good faith because we have been unable to see or know anyone out of this 8.1 million households that got the N25,000. As citizens of Nigeria, we are entitled to be adequately informed because the methodology said to have been adopted by the government in redistribution of this taxpayers’ money is opaque and lacks ingredients of transparency and accountability.”
HURIWA is also urging President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to speak up about the growing accusations of corruption against some of his cabinet-level appointees one of which is the minister of the FCT.
HURIWA recalled that former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) in the 2023 election, Omoyele Sowore, had petitioned the Attorney-General of Florida, James Uthmeier, demanding the forfeiture and prosecution of alleged multi-million-dollar properties secretly acquired in the United States by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Ezenwo Nyesom Wike.
In a petition signed by his counsel, Deji Adeyanju, dated September 22, Sowore alleged that Wike, alongside his wife, Justice Eberechi Suzzette Nyesom-Wike of the Nigerian Court of Appeal, unlawfully purchased three lakeside properties in Winter Springs, Florida, worth over $6m.
The petition claimed the acquisitions were “conducted entirely in cash, thereby circumventing banking oversight and raising significant money laundering concerns.”
According to the documents, the properties include 113 Springcreek Lane, purchased for $535,000 and transferred to Jordan Wike; 209 Hertherwood Court, purchased for $459,157 and transferred to Joaquin Wike; and 208 Hertherwood Court, purchased for $465,000 and transferred to Jazmyne Wike.
The petition stressed that Wike, “a career politician with no record of legitimate private enterprise,” could not have earned the income to fund such acquisitions, adding that the assets were not declared to Nigeria’s Code of Conduct Bureau in violation of constitutional obligations.
Sowore, in his petition, stated that, “The evident pattern in this case involves large cash acquisitions by a long-serving public officer with no legitimate private earnings, the immediate transfer of title to his children, and the concealment of true beneficial ownership.
HURIWA said: “Whilst we await the decision of the foreign entity regarding the petition said to have been sent to them, accusing the minister of FCT of illegally buying up juicy housing assets in the USA using allegedly looted public funds. But we expect that when such a very weighty accusations are made consistently against a serving minister, the President ought to publicly make a statement regarding what the position of his government is especially given that the President told the World in Brazil that his administration is waging a relentless war against corruption.”
“We know that when accusations of corruption was made by the then minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation, President Tinubu suspended and thereafter fired the minister from her duty. Nigerians expect that since nobody is above the law, when accusations of corruption are made against a Nigerian public office holder, the appointing authority is expected to weigh in one way or the other so the citizens are assured of the government’s commitment to the war against corruption. The President should also direct the Minister of Finance to furnish Nigerians with verifiable evidence to prove that government actually disbursed N330 billion to some poor households”.
-
News10 months agoNUJ FCT Council Mourns The Loss of Senior Journalist, Isaiah Abraham
-
News10 months agoHURIWA Declares Governor Fubara’s Emergence as Divine, Urges Support for Rivers State’s Progress
-
News10 months agoAnioma State as panacea to South-East marginalization – By Emmanuel Onwubiko
-
Opinion8 months agoNIGERIAN WOMAN IN DIASPORA, CULTURAL SHOCKS – By Stacey Ukaobasi Onwuegbuchulam
-
News11 months agoHURIWA Blames Serial Stampedes on Weaponized Poverty, Warns of Nigeria’s Rapid Decline
-
News10 months agoJealous Husband Stabs Nigerian Bishop To Death Over Suspicion Of Sleeping With Estranged Wife
-
News10 months agoTinubu sympathizes with ex-speaker Bankole on the death of his mother
-
Health8 months agoA complete list of 154 healthcare facilities across Nigeria that provide free emergency obstetric care and VVF (Vesico-Vaginal Fistula) surgeries.
