News
US Supreme Court to Hear Mexico’s $10 Billion Lawsuit Against American Gun Manufacturers
WASHINGTON, DC – SEPTEMBER 02: The U.S. Supreme Court, showcased in a photograph taken on September 02, 2021, in Washington, D.C., is set to address a controversial and high-profile case regarding gun manufacturers. Notably, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to allow a Texas law that significantly restricts abortions after six weeks of pregnancy to remain in effect.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will deliberate on a $10 billion lawsuit brought by the Mexican government against American gun manufacturers, accusing them of exacerbating drug trafficking and violent crime in Mexico. The prominent companies involved in this case, Smith & Wesson and the U.S. gun distributor Interstate Arms, are actively seeking to dismiss the lawsuit, which has been navigating through various levels of the U.S. judicial system since it was first filed in 2021.
Initially, a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit in 2022, stating that the claims presented by Mexico did not overcome the extensive legal protections granted to firearms manufacturers under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). This federal law, enacted by Congress in 2005, provides broad immunity to gun manufacturers from liability when their products are misused by criminals, unless specific exceptions apply.
However, in a significant turn of events, an appeals court revived the case, referencing an exception to the PLCAA, which grants certain protections in cases of negligent behavior. In response to this revival, Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms petitioned the Supreme Court for relief. The Court, which currently holds a conservative majority of 6-3 and has consistently supported expansive interpretations of gun rights, will now weigh these arguments.
In its legal filing, the Mexican government asserts that escalating violence from drug cartels, which has resulted in tens of thousands of casualties over the years, is significantly fueled by the influx of firearms originating from the United States. Mexican lawyers argue that Smith & Wesson and other firearm manufacturers engage in a “negligent and illicit” trade, a characterization aimed at highlighting the consequences of their business practices on public safety in Mexico. “Mexico simply seeks to halt the unlawful flow of guns into our country,” the legal team for the Mexican government emphasized in their official brief, requesting $10 billion in damages.
The attorneys further clarified that this lawsuit is not intended to serve as a platform for debating the constitutional right to bear arms, as encapsulated in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Instead, they argue that the case is primarily focused on the responsibility of manufacturers for the impact of their products when they contribute to violence.
Conversely, lawyers representing Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms contend that holding the manufacturers accountable for the criminal misuse of their products is unjust and would effectively undermine the very protections established by the PLCAA. “When a company operates within the legal framework to offer lawful goods to the market, it cannot be held liable for the subsequent unlawful actions taken by individual criminals,” they argued. They assert that the responsibility for any criminal actions linked to the firearms should rest solely with the individuals who misuse them.
Mexico’s claims are bolstered by alarming statistics, suggesting that between 70% to 90% of firearms recovered at crime scenes within its borders are traced back to the United States. An estimated annual flow of 200,000 to 750,000 American-made weapons is believed to be smuggled across the border, contributing significantly to the pervasive violence that has plagued Mexico since the government deployed military forces to combat drug trafficking in 2006. According to official records, this ongoing violence has claimed the lives of approximately 480,000 individuals.
‘Slander’ Accusation Against US Government
In a related context, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum issued a stern warning to U.S. gun manufacturers last month, cautioning them that they could face further legal repercussions and possibly be labeled as accomplices should the U.S. government designate Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. On February 20, the State Department officially classified Mexico’s two leading drug trafficking organizations, the Jalisco New Generation Cartel and the Sinaloa Cartel, among others, as foreign terrorist organizations, raising the stakes in cross-border relations.
Sheinbaum vehemently rejected allegations from the U.S. government that her administration has colluded with drug cartels. “We categorically reject the slander made by the White House against the Mexican government regarding supposed alliances with criminal organizations,” she expressed via a post on X. “If any such alliance exists, it is within U.S. gun retailers that sell powerful weapons to these criminal groups,” she added, reinforcing her position.
Tensions between the U.S. and Mexico escalated dramatically after President Trump, soon after taking office, imposed a 25% tariff on Mexican imports, attributing the decision to issues of illegal immigration and the circulation of deadly fentanyl across borders. In response, Sheinbaum threatened retaliatory tariffs, prompting a temporary compromise from Trump, who agreed to pause the tariffs for one month in exchange for Mexico pledging to deploy an additional 10,000 troops to its northern border.
Recently, Mexico has taken significant steps to combat its ongoing drug war, including the extradition of several high-profile imprisoned drug lords to the U.S., including a notorious cartel kingpin who had been sought for decades in connection with the murder of a U.S. undercover agent. These developments reflect the complex and often fraught relationship between the two neighboring countries as they seek to address shared challenges related to drug trafficking and violence.
News
ARISE News Anchor Somtochukwu Maduagwu Found Dead Following Abuja Robbery, Reports FCTA
The Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) has confirmed that Somtochukwu Maduagwu was brought to Maitama Hospital without vital signs after a robbery incident at her home in Abuja.
Dr. Dolapo Fasawe, the Mandate Secretary on Health for the FCTA, stated that ARISE News anchor Somtochukwu Maduagwu was pronounced dead upon arrival at Maitama General Hospital at approximately 4:30 am on Monday. This clarification was issued via a statement from the FCTA, aimed at addressing earlier claims that medical negligence contributed to her demise following the robbery.
Somtochukwu Christelle Maduagwu, affectionately known as Sommie, was a 29-year-old journalist tragically killed during an armed robbery at her Katampe residence in Abuja in the early hours of Monday, September 29, 2025.
Residents of the apartment complex reported that the attack transpired around 3 a.m. when over 15 armed robbers invaded the 16-apartment building. Witnesses indicated that security personnel sounded the alarm and tried to reach the police, but there was no immediate response. Sommie and a security guard, who also sustained injuries during the incident, were promptly taken to Maitama District Hospital. However, family members claimed they were denied urgent treatment due to not having identification documents readily available. Both victims later succumbed to their injuries.
In the meantime, FCT Minister Nyesom Wike expressed his condolences to the management and staff of ARISE News Channel regarding the unfortunate demise of Somtochukwu Maduagwu. He described her death as both tragic and painful, and he prayed for God’s continued support for the staff of ARISE News, particularly for the Chairman, Prince Nduka Obaigbena, and for the family and friends of the late journalist. The minister noted that a preliminary medical report would be provided to the police to assist in their investigation, emphasizing that all necessary steps would be taken to uncover the details surrounding her death. He reassured the family, friends, and colleagues of Somtochukwu Maduagwu that the police are committed to discovering the circumstances of her passing and ensuring that those responsible face justice.
Source: ARISE TV
News
Negotiations With Terrorists Undermine Elements Of Nigeria’s Statehood: HURIWA says
Pro-democracy and civil rights advocacy group HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has condemned the Federal government for permitting some states in the North-west to negotiate the so-called peace agreement with terrorists, criminal gangs and armed kidnappers, just as the Rights group said the negotiations have undermined and eroded the key elements of Nigeria’s statehood.
HURIWA blames the ambiguities of the Federal government on how to deal decisively with armed brutes killing thousands of Nigerians for the expanding frontiers of terrorist attacks and the unprecedented insecurity in many parts of Nigeria. “Since the Federal Government is creating the impression that it is open to dialogue with terrorists, then more and more desperate criminals would escalate their criminal activities, hoping that they too would merit an invitation for dialogue by the current administration that is already discussing with terrorists in the North West for the so-called peace.
Criminal gang members who are watching the dialogue sessions with terrorists in the North West will automatically become daring and bloody so as to gain attention of the government that is too weak to militarily defeat terrorists and very willing to enter into negotiations for the so-called truce.”
HURIWA which expressed the position that any public office holder or private individual who negotiates with terrorists is also a terrorist, has therefore called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to stop the disgraceful surrendering of the Nigerian state to the whims and caprices of a motley crowd of armed bandits, bloodstained terrorists, armed kidnappers and criminal gangs in Katsina and some other states in the Northern States of Nigeria.
HURIWA said there is no doubt that what have played out in the last couple of weeks in Katsina, Zamfara and other places in the North West of Nigeria in the guise of local and state governments negotiating with terrorists for the so-called truce, amounted to the demolition of the four fundamental elements that qualifies Nigeria as a Sovereignty even as HURIWA postulated that the state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population (people); (b) a defined territory; (c) government (political authority); and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states (diplomat recognition or sovereignty).
HURIWA which condemned the negotiations with terrorists, said the impression being created globally with these charades going on in Katsina by way of negotiations for peace with terrorists responsible for killings of dozens of citizens is that Nigeria has gradually lost those key elements of statehood. HURIWA also stated that the negotiations have completely rubbished the determination of the families of victims of terrorism from achieving any sort of closure and justice for the terminations of the lives of their loved ones and the losses of livelihoods they suffered as a result of terrorist attacks.
HURIWA asked rhetorically thus: “Is it not preposterous that whilst the president Tinubu’s government has sanctioned negotiations with terrorists that are wanted by advanced and sophisticated nations such as the United States, the same administration sent out the Vice President Kashim Shettima to the United Nations General Assembly in New York to canvass that Nigeria be made a permanent member of the security council of the United Nations?
“Is this not a pathetic irony to openly demonstrate to the World that Nigeria’s statehood is eroding fast, as demonstrated by the show of shame called peaceful negotiations with terrorists who attended the so-called truce meetings in Katsina state, wielding some of the most sophisticated weapons of mass destruction and other combat weapons of military grades?
Has this government in Nigeria no shame and has the government no respect for the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria? We insist that terrorists must be made to face the full wrath of justice, just as we believe that government is obliged to take justice to terrorists or bring terrorists to justice for their crimes of bloodshed and destruction of livelihoods of Nigerians.
HURIWA recalled that authorities in Nigeria’s northwestern Katsina state reportedly struck a so-called peace deal with criminal gangs in what it says is an effort to end years of violence, a government official confirmed to the media.
HURIWA recalled that Katsina is one of several states in northwestern and central Nigeria terrorized by criminal gangs that the locals refer to as bandits. The federal government, through the Defence Headquarters, had previously declared the leaders of the terrorists groups now negotiating with government as terrorists, even as huge amounts of money was promised as rewards for information leading to their arrests.
HURIWA wondered the logic in negotiating with criminal gangs that continuously raid villages, rape girls and children, kill and abduct residents, as well as torch homes after looting them.
HURIWA recalled that the terrorists and criminal gangs maintain camps in a huge forest straddling Zamfara, Katsina, Kaduna states in the northwest region and Niger state in the country’s central zone and have carried out mass kidnappings of students from schools in recent years.
HURIWA recalled that the Katsina State Government confirmed that a dozen bandit kingpins met with local officials and community leaders in the town of Danmusa, where they renounced violence and pledged to turn a new leaf, Nasiru Mu’azu, Katsina state internal commissioner said.
“There was a peace meeting between 12 bandit leaders and the local community leaders in Danmusa, where the bandits renounced their criminal activities and committed to peace,” Mu’azu said.
The bandits initiated the meeting, he said. “The community welcomed the overtures and agreed to a peace deal as long as the bandits are genuinely interested in peace,” he said.
Katsina state government stated that as a mark of goodwill, the bandits surrendered weapons and released 17 hostages, with the promise to free more people they were holding.
HURIWA said security experts have cautioned against any sort of appeasement of terrorists because, as criminals with zero ideological leaning, the bandits are motivated by financial gains, but their increasing business and operational alliance with jihadists from the northeast has been raising concern among government officials, which is the reason for the illegal negotiations with terrorists.
HURIWA pointed out that in 2023, Katsina state governor Dikko Umar Radda established Katsina Community Watch Corps, comprising around 2,000 vigilantes to assist the military and police in fighting the bandits.
“We have been fighting the bandits for the past two years, and the state governor has reiterated he will not negotiate from a position of weakness,” Mu’azu, the Katsina state official said.
In the media statement by the National Coordinator, Comrade Emmanuel Nnadozie Onwubiko, HURIWA reiterated its position of zero tolerance for any sort of negotiations with terrorists because that would amount to state surrender.
“We are asking President Tinubu to stop these acts of treason in the name of negotiations with terrorists. We believe that no matter the quantum of cash paid out to these terrorists now dialoguing with Katsina and other Northern governments, the moment the blood money finishes, these terrorists who are already used to making hundreds of millions of blood money will simply return to their familiar terrains of terrorism and when they do return, they would be even more vicious than they are now.”
COMRADE EMMANUEL NNADOZIE ONWUBIKO,
NATIONAL COORDINATOR,
HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA).
MONDAY SEPTEMBER 29TH 2025.
News
Corruption Becoming Endemic Now: HURIWA Says
TASKS government on transparency in conditional cash transfer
Civil Rights advocacy Group HUMAN RIGHTS WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (HURIWA) has expressed worry about the apparent inability of the Federal government to come clean on how N330 billion was disbursed to 8.1 million households without any compliance with the principles of transparency and accountability. “Most Nigerians are wondering whether this huge sum of public funds were shared to ghosts or to real citizens since these households are not known by millions of Nigerians.”
Besides, HURIWA has raised alarm that corruption is perceived to be so high within the government circles even as the Rights group said it was wrong for President Tinubu to keep silent in the face of mounting accusations of corruption affecting some of his appointees including the allegations of acquisitions of exotic housing assets by the Minister of the Federal capital territory Mr. Nyesom Wike with allegedly looted public funds.
HURIWA recalled that the federal Government had few days ago, announced that it has disbursed a total of N330bn to 8.1 million households across the country under the National Social Safety Net Programme, aimed at cushioning the harsh effects of economic reforms on Nigeria’s poorest and most vulnerable citizens.
The disclosure was made in Abuja by the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, after a review meeting of the Special Presidential Panel on Social Investment, inaugurated by President Bola Tinubu in February.
Edun explained that the programme, which experienced delays earlier in the year, was now firmly back on track following the successful integration of biometric data through the National Identification Number. This integration, he said, was crucial to ensuring transparency, curbing leakages, and eliminating political interference.
According to the minister, out of the 19.7 million households captured in the National Social Register—representing about 70 million Nigerians—8.1 million households have already received at least one tranche of the N25,000 stipend. Some beneficiaries have received two or three payments depending on verification outcomes.
Reacting to the widespread failure of the Federal Government to evidently show believable proof of how this humongous cash were disbursed and to clearly publicise the identities of these beneficiaries, HURIWA said it is shocking that a democratically elected government put in place by the people, could come up with such seemingly phantom claim to have distributed financial lifelines to some impoverished citizens without any concrete evidence.
In a media statement by the National Coordinator Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko, HURIWA criticised the federal ministry of Finance and the Coordinating ministry for the Nigerian economy for issuing out the press statement making the claim that can’t be empirically verified just as the Rights group said over ten thousand members of the organisation spread across the Country has not reported knowing or hearing about any Nigerian poor citizens/households who benefitted from the cash redistribution by the federal government.
“We are challenging the Federal Ministry of Finance and the Coordinating Minister of the Economy to prove to Nigerians that his ministry paid out the sum of N330 bn to 8.1 million households by publishing on the website of the ministry and newspapers the identities of the beneficiaries, their locations and the number in each of the benefiting states or local government areas. This demand is made in good faith because we have been unable to see or know anyone out of this 8.1 million households that got the N25,000. As citizens of Nigeria, we are entitled to be adequately informed because the methodology said to have been adopted by the government in redistribution of this taxpayers’ money is opaque and lacks ingredients of transparency and accountability.”
HURIWA is also urging President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to speak up about the growing accusations of corruption against some of his cabinet-level appointees one of which is the minister of the FCT.
HURIWA recalled that former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) in the 2023 election, Omoyele Sowore, had petitioned the Attorney-General of Florida, James Uthmeier, demanding the forfeiture and prosecution of alleged multi-million-dollar properties secretly acquired in the United States by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Ezenwo Nyesom Wike.
In a petition signed by his counsel, Deji Adeyanju, dated September 22, Sowore alleged that Wike, alongside his wife, Justice Eberechi Suzzette Nyesom-Wike of the Nigerian Court of Appeal, unlawfully purchased three lakeside properties in Winter Springs, Florida, worth over $6m.
The petition claimed the acquisitions were “conducted entirely in cash, thereby circumventing banking oversight and raising significant money laundering concerns.”
According to the documents, the properties include 113 Springcreek Lane, purchased for $535,000 and transferred to Jordan Wike; 209 Hertherwood Court, purchased for $459,157 and transferred to Joaquin Wike; and 208 Hertherwood Court, purchased for $465,000 and transferred to Jazmyne Wike.
The petition stressed that Wike, “a career politician with no record of legitimate private enterprise,” could not have earned the income to fund such acquisitions, adding that the assets were not declared to Nigeria’s Code of Conduct Bureau in violation of constitutional obligations.
Sowore, in his petition, stated that, “The evident pattern in this case involves large cash acquisitions by a long-serving public officer with no legitimate private earnings, the immediate transfer of title to his children, and the concealment of true beneficial ownership.
HURIWA said: “Whilst we await the decision of the foreign entity regarding the petition said to have been sent to them, accusing the minister of FCT of illegally buying up juicy housing assets in the USA using allegedly looted public funds. But we expect that when such a very weighty accusations are made consistently against a serving minister, the President ought to publicly make a statement regarding what the position of his government is especially given that the President told the World in Brazil that his administration is waging a relentless war against corruption.”
“We know that when accusations of corruption was made by the then minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation, President Tinubu suspended and thereafter fired the minister from her duty. Nigerians expect that since nobody is above the law, when accusations of corruption are made against a Nigerian public office holder, the appointing authority is expected to weigh in one way or the other so the citizens are assured of the government’s commitment to the war against corruption. The President should also direct the Minister of Finance to furnish Nigerians with verifiable evidence to prove that government actually disbursed N330 billion to some poor households”.
-
News10 months agoNUJ FCT Council Mourns The Loss of Senior Journalist, Isaiah Abraham
-
News10 months agoHURIWA Declares Governor Fubara’s Emergence as Divine, Urges Support for Rivers State’s Progress
-
News10 months agoAnioma State as panacea to South-East marginalization – By Emmanuel Onwubiko
-
Opinion8 months agoNIGERIAN WOMAN IN DIASPORA, CULTURAL SHOCKS – By Stacey Ukaobasi Onwuegbuchulam
-
News11 months agoHURIWA Blames Serial Stampedes on Weaponized Poverty, Warns of Nigeria’s Rapid Decline
-
News10 months agoJealous Husband Stabs Nigerian Bishop To Death Over Suspicion Of Sleeping With Estranged Wife
-
News10 months agoTinubu sympathizes with ex-speaker Bankole on the death of his mother
-
Health8 months agoA complete list of 154 healthcare facilities across Nigeria that provide free emergency obstetric care and VVF (Vesico-Vaginal Fistula) surgeries.
